![]() I can then use my command-line interface from my OMV system to go to /opt, and run "chmod -R 755 portainer." This sets folder permissions on portainer as 755, or "owner may read, write, execute group and other may read and execute." I would also need to run "chown user:group portainer" are the user/group I want to "own" portainer, for example "chown docker:users portainer" would set it so that the user "docker" was the owner of the portainer folder, and any user in the "users" group would be able to read and execute, but not write, in the portainer folder. ![]() I map that to the docker container in the settings as -v /opt/portainer:/config, since /config is where I know my docker container expects the files to be. So you create a directory on your host system where the docker info for portainer is going to live, in my case, /opt/portainer. For example, let's say you're like me and running the docker container "portainer" to manage your dockers. So the way Docker interfaces with your "host" system is that you have to map your host drives to the docker container. You can have Python 2.7 installed in one container for an older app, and Python 3.x installed in another container for a newer one, without the headaches that would normally bring. OMV is built on top of Debian, for example, but you can run a dockerized app on top of Alpine Linux or whatever. This is a godsend because now you're not managing different apps against different versions of common libraries or even the base system. Rather than try to make your OMV system itself hospitable to each application, the docker system lets you run lots of small, individual systems tailored to the app. Think of each docker container a mini-PC running on your OMV system. The docker plug-in is really just a small plug-in to manage docker containers. If so, it makes this software prohibitively expensive for family use.Sorry, you'd run chmod as a command from the command line when you SSH into your OMV machine, or use the Shellinabox plugin. ![]() I'll lodge a ticket and ask for clarification. I'm new to trying out Resilio Sync but this reads as if I cannot use a 'Family' license on an x86 Linux or x86 NAS. Sync Business requires license which can be purchased from our site - Server support is available for packs with 20 seats and more If you've already bought Sync Business and realised that you need to run it on a server OS, update your license to support servers in License Management Console." Installation on these is not supported at all.įor Sync Business: server operating system means all Windows Server group and Linux and NAS with non-arm based CPU. "Running on a Server: For Sync Home Free or Pro: server operating system means all Windows Servers. This is nothing new as it has been policy since ver 2.5 up to 5 users = home, more than 5 = business. I personally think Resilio could have just implemented this as a limitation on number of users being sync'ed to be fairer across all server versions e.g. If you insist to still use Windows Server your options are pay for the correct Resilio business license OR switch your OS to a version suitable for 'home' Resilio license.įrankly speaking, I think if you can afford the obscene Microsoft licensing costs of Windows server, you can well afford to pay Resilio for the correct business license also. Resilio is trying to stop businesses from abusing 'home' licensed versions on their servers. "Deprecated: support for WindowsServers for Sync home" Hang on a minute, this is a licensing issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |